Alberta Suspends Grizzly Hunt
March 14th, 2006 David King - King's Outdoor World

Alberta suspends (ban) the spring grizzly hunt stating that there are too few grizzlies than originally thought. Alberta’s provincial Ministry of Sustainable Resource Development has announced a suspension of its spring grizzly bear hunt while DNA census data is collected, which will continue “over the next few years.” Minister Dave Coutts said, “While we pursue better grizzly bear population estimates, Alberta will take the most precautionary approach possible with the spring hunt.” Two experts from Montana universities will provide scientific peer review of the provincial Draft Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan.
What does this mean? There is a ban on grizzly hunting in Alberta for three years. During this time they want to get more conclusive evidence of the true population of the grizzly bears. They claim there are projected population numbers of 1000 plus, however, the numbers could be as low as 500 or less. Because of the lack of valid population data, they are suspending the hunt to ensure the future of the grizzly bear.
I have my concerns about this. Whenever something is taken away, it is very difficult to re-instate. There is a tremendous push from the animal rights groups to ban bear hunting altogether. They are using this as a tremendous moral victory and now have three years to put the pressure on the government to keep it banned even if numbers are stable and on the rise. Will this be the last of the grizzly bear hunt for Alberta? Even in British Columbia, where there are an estimated 13,800 grizzly bears, a debate has been raging over the hunt. We will know in three years.
Information from CBC News state that Alberta issued 73 grizzly licences in 2005. Ten bears were killed in the hunt, and another 12 were killed in other circumstances, including two “problem bears,” two shot illegally and two killed in self defence. Conservationists wanted the hunt stopped because Alberta’s grizzly population is shrinking, but the Alberta Fish and Game Association favours a modest hunt to deal with “problem bears.”
Another article posted an interesting twist to the positive affects of hunting:
Ray Makowecki, a wildlife biologist and past president of the Alberta Fish & Game Association, said Alberta’s grizzly bears don’t need Mr. Bonko’s help. “There was a debate a few years ago as to whether there was less than 500 or more than 900 grizzly bears in Alberta,” Mr. Makowecki said. “It’s very difficult to count bears. The new estimates are in the 700 range.” That means the population has been stable during the 15 years that the hunting-draw system has been in place, he said. And it may even be increasing. “There is some anecdotal, very important indicators of trends, and these are the people who are outdoors, the conservation officers, the biologists, outfitters and hunters. … If you talk to someone who’s spent 30 years in the bush, there’s no question but that there are more grizzlies. “From that perspective, we say the hunt has no impact … and it should continue.” Mr. Makowecki, a former regional wildlife director for the province, said there’s also the important matter of continued grizzly bear monitoring. As long as there is a hunt, he said, wildlife biologists will keep a close watch on the bear population to make sure a decline doesn’t begin. Without the hunt, such monitoring would stop.
Entry Filed under: News and Stuff


3 Comments Add your own
1. Mike | March 19th, 2006 at 7:02 pm
re: Grizzly hunt in Alberta.
Your website says it best. Once you take something away, it’s hard to get it back. This includes things on the species level. Once you take a species away, it will be gone for good. Not to say I’m against hunting, b/c I am not. However, let’s be realistic about the grizzly situation. People are travelling in the backcountry more and more with ease caused by exploration, improvements in technologies, etc. More and more people find themselves in bear country, and low and behold, see bears. Bears are not increasing in Alberta. Let’s listen to the science, because that’s what it’s there for. Bears and wildlife and they’re habitat are not just for people. Let’s be smart so we can have wildlife for all times.
Respectfully,
Mike Tyrell
2. Alberta-wes | August 23rd, 2006 at 3:37 pm
I am not certain that the situation here in Alberta is as grave as the antis and do-gooders might have people believe. I just a couple months ago, read an article, and I just cant remember where it was from. It stated that these individuals believed the population to be at a mere 100 approx bears. Now I have hunted all over Alberta as a resident, and have been whitness to many Grizzly sightings over the years, and folks, there are thousands of square miles of bush country that lie right in the middle of griz habitat. So, with those estimates of possibly only 100 bears, and a tag count of just over 70 licences, what we are looking at, is nothing short of a miracle. Basically, Alberta outdoorsman in one year, by doing simple math, have harvested one tenth of the population, with the 10 bears taken. Absured. The numbers listed in the above statements are probably more realistic, however this is very rugged country, and all estimates have apparently been compiled from hair analasys obtained from bait sites. Once again, this is a big piece of turf. As an Alberta Outdoorsman, I believe this bear population can sustain a harvest. In this new modern world, what with advancements into the backcountry from industry etc, what is logically more of a threat to this species, a small tag allotment for a spring hunt, to control surplus numbers of these big predators, or depletion, and degradation of habitat. I would say its the habitat that requires saving.
3. Alex | December 15th, 2006 at 10:51 am
I don’t think anyone would argue with that Alberta-wes! We all need to be conservationists of habitat. Every type of wildlife is prone to problems due to habitat loss. Some species have come to the forefront of the pack of those who do not adapt to mans encroachment. Grizzlies certainly come to mind in that group.
Leave a Comment
Comment Post Guidelines
1. If you include swear words/vulgar language, your comment will be deleted
2. If you attack somebody personally, your comment will also be deleted
3. If you have something beneficial to add, please carry on...Thanks!
NOTE: All Comments are moderated and must be approved before being posted
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed