Wolves are Back on Endangered List
July 22nd, 2008 David King - King's Outdoor World

What a turn around of events. Wolves are delisted, wolf hunts are in the works, and now wolves have been temporarily put back on the endangered species list. How can this be so? About 12 Environmentalist Groups (Earthjustice, Humane Society, Defenders of Wildlife, etc.) is how it can be so. I told you about their pending lawsuit they filed April 28, 2008. Exactly 60 days after the delisting was signed. They know they law very well, have a ton of money and do just what they need to do to stall this thing out.
Judge Donald Molloy issued on Friday, July 18, 2008 an injunction to suspend the removal of wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains from the federal Endangered Species List. Wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains were removed from the Endangered Species List in March 2008. A number of environmental groups are challenging the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s delisting decision. Friday’s injunction effectively returns management authority for wolves in the region to the federal government while these legal challenges are heard.
What about Wyoming’s open hunts?
As a result of Friday’s injunction, wolves can no longer be taken anywhere in Wyoming except in cases where wolves are in the act of attacking livestock. Ranchers who are experiencing livestock depredation problems anywhere in the state should contact their local Wyoming Game and Fish office.
What about Idaho’s upcoming hunts?
There will be no wolf hunting season in Idaho this year. Idaho Fish and Game will not issue any wolf hunting tags.
Wolves have reverted to management under a section of the Endangered Species Act known as the 10(j) rule, which was revised in January.
Link: View the text of the revised 10(j) rule - (PDF)
So what happened?
The Environmentalists convinced the judge that the State agencies didn’t follow all of the rules to delist the wolves. Even though the states have established laws that will maintain a stable population and breeding pairs, regardless of the hunts, the Environmentalists argue that the states won’t do this. The federal biologist who led the wolf restoration program, Ed Bangs, defended the decision to delist wolves as “a very biologically sound package.”
“The kind of hunting proposed by the states wouldn’t threaten the wolf population,” Bangs said Friday. “We felt the science was rock solid and that the delisting was warranted.”
Here is the conclusion from the judges ruling:
For these reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (dkt #2) is GRANTED. Endangered Species Act protections are hereby reinstated for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf pending final resolution of this matter on the merits.
Dated this 18 day of July, 2008, 16:04 p.m. th
So what were the reasons. I have provided a link to the judges ruling and you can read the whole thing here:
Link: Judges Ruling on wolf injunction (PDF)
In a nutshell, the main argument that the Environmental groups used was the fact that the wolves have not had a chance to interbreed. What that means is the wolves from Wyoming, Idaho and Montana need to interbreed to provide a stable population 60 years down the road.
Here is an excerpt from the the ruling:
Plaintiffs claim the Fish & Wildlife Service violated the Endangered Species Act by delisting the wolf while knowing there was a lack of genetic exchange between populations in the three northern Rocky Mountain core recovery areas. The legal deficiency claimed is that in doing so the Service ignored its own recovery criteria and ignored the best science available.
Here is an excerpt from the introduction of the ruling:
Introduction
This case, like a cloud larger than a man’s hand, will hang over the northwest states of Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming until there has been a final determination of the complex issues presented. Those issues must be answered in accordance with the intent of Congress as stated in the Endangered Species Act and its implementing regulations. Here, Plaintiffs challenge the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s decision to designate and delist a northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf distinct population segment under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1536. In
seeking to alter the course of that decision, Plaintiffs move for a preliminary injunction. They ask the Court to reinstate ESA protections for the wolf, at least while this lawsuit is pending. In support of their motion, Plaintiffs argue (1) even though the environmental impact statement on wolf reintroduction specifically conditions the delisting decision on a Finding of Subpopulation Genetic Exchange, the Fish & Wildlife Service delisted the wolf when there is no plausible showing of that genetic exchange between the Greater Yellowstone core recovery area and the northwestern Montana and central Idaho core recovery areas; (2) the Service approved Wyoming’s 2007 wolf management plan even though the Wyoming plan still contains provisions that the Service earlier deemed inadequate; and (3) the Fish & Wildlife Service did not consider the several states’ liberal defense of property laws in concluding the states’ wolf management plans were adequate. The argument concludes with the claim that a preliminary injunction is necessary because wolves are not likely to survive the increased incidents of human-caused
mortality that will occur under state management.
So what happens next?
The judge is going to determine if keeping the wolves on the Endangered Species List will continue or not. Unfortunately I think the anti-groups are going to keep pumping money into this ruling and tie it up in the courts as long as they can. What’s even more unfortunate is that this is not about proper animal management and conservation. This about pushing an agenda - a way of thinking - that is anti-human, anti-hunting and that animals (specifically predators) should rule the earth. This is the case of the wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Could be a shaky future and the excitement of finally getting some control and management of the wolf here in the West is at a standstill.
Entry Filed under: News and Stuff

7 Comments Add your own
1. N. Young | July 22nd, 2008 at 3:23 pm
Call me crazy (I know you probably will), but I agree with Judge Molloy’s findings. The wolves in the Northwest Rockies have had distinct gene pools, interbreeding and not developing healthier stock that would help them survive. This is what it means to be endangered.
There are alternatives to rushing out and shooting wolves. Not everyone who agrees with this finding is gaga over predators — I understand the threat they pose. I also understand how imbalanced wildlife becomes when there isn’t a healthy stock of predators to clear out the ungulates, rodents, and other animals that cause just as much if not more harm to whatever the hunters think they’re protecting.
Not everything in this world needs to be shot. That is not responsible hunting.
2. Matt | July 22nd, 2008 at 4:12 pm
Utah and states close who have healthy elk heards should now really start to get nervous………….
3. chris rinabarger | July 22nd, 2008 at 8:30 pm
just wanted to say that i’ve hunted around paridice valley for almost 15 years now and the wolves have had an effect not only on the elk, but on many other fronts. such as livestock with fewer elk on forest lands. lets open montanas private land that our lockec up in leasing or no hunting without a fee.
4. Nate | July 24th, 2008 at 11:07 am
Unfortunatly we all knew this was goimg to happen, the HUGGERS have way too much money, and nothing better to do than mess with things that should be left alone. Quit lying about the wolves, they are doing just fine, if we hunters or cattlemen kill some wolves THEY WILL STILL BE FINE! They aren’t going anywhere, and we AREN’T slaughtering them like the HUGGERS want to believe. Whats this crap about they need to inter-breed with the wolves from the other states? Arent they all basically from the original wolves that were put in Yellowstone? Wow, do the HUGGERS have any kind of brain at all??? Their stupidity boggles my mind… And this judge that ruled on this? Let me guess, his courtroom is no where the western states that have these wolves, and he’s never been here either. I know this ruling won’t stop me or my buddies to pull the trigger on any wolf we see this fall when we are elk hunting in the great state of Wyoming. Like we’ve been doing for years “shoot and keep riding”
5. Larry | July 29th, 2008 at 10:32 am
I’ve read that we now have official wolve sightings in Oregon, Washington and Colorado. California and Nevada cannot be far behind. There was no intent on having established wolve packs in these states…yet, it’s happening. I’m not anti wolve, but they, like mountain lions need to have some fear of man, and that can be established by having a hunting season. What started out as a good idea of re-establishing a predator to land they once roamed has now turned into an uncontrollable mess that is like a freight train running down the track. In 10 years wolves will be eveywhere and deer and elk we then need to be placed on the Endangered Species Act.
6. cgibbs | August 7th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
I think the tree huger n young has never had to hunt in wolf country and he probably is not even a hunter
7. tom | May 13th, 2009 at 3:29 am
im 60 years old and have hunted mt. saint hellens area for 25 years. last year in elk season i saw a wolf for the first time. it was standing on a logging road less than 30 yards away, i know the difference between a wolf and a coyote. this was definatly a wolf
Leave a Comment
Comment Post Guidelines
1. If you include swear words/vulgar language, your comment will be deleted
2. If you attack somebody personally, your comment will also be deleted
3. If you have something beneficial to add, please carry on...Thanks!
NOTE: All Comments are moderated and must be approved before being posted
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed